Impact on Employee Maintenance Costs (Glossary)
Employer
Element:
Impact on Employee Maintenance Costs
Employer (WP4):
This element was considered to play a slightly negative role in the employment decision on whether to recruit PWD. Italy and Norway considered it a particularly negative factor.
Employer
| Element | TO | AU | DK | FI | FR | DE | IRL | IT | M | NL | NO | PT | RO | SL | SI | UK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact on Employee Maintenance Costs | -0.17 | 0.5 | 0.22 | -0.22 | -0.11 | -0.44 | -0.5 | -1.1 | 0 | 0.25 | -1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.89 | -0.4 | -0.17 |
N = 10
This element uses a positive/negative scale ranging from –3 (very negative) to +3 (very positive). -/+ 2 means somewhat negative/positive -/+ 1 means a little negative/positive and 0 means neutral. Somewhat positive ratings are highlighted in a “light green” colour. Very positive ratings are highlighted in “dark green”. Countries with a somewhat negative rating are highlighted in “orange” and countries with a very negative rating are highlighted in red.
In relation to impact on employee maintenance costs ratings ranging from –2 to –3 inclusive are given a red colour. Those from –1 to –1.99 inclusive are highlighted in orange. Positive ratings from 1.5 to 2.24 inclusive are highlighted in “light green” and those ranging from 2.25 to 3 inclusive are highlighted in “dark green”.